Residents urge levy renewal and warn proposed flag/display policy could harm special‑needs students
Loading...
Summary
Public commenters asked trustees to support a renewal of the district’s long‑standing emergency levy and asked the board to revise a proposed flag/display policy so classroom visuals that help nonverbal and special‑needs students are not removed.
Multiple members of the public addressed the board during the Oct. 28 meeting, urging support for a levy renewal and asking the board to reconsider a proposed flag/display policy that, they said, could remove classroom visual supports used by students with disabilities.
A resident who did not give a name (presenting financial figures) urged support for renewing an emergency levy that originally passed in 2011. The presenter said the levy currently raises about $10.6 million annually, noted district enrollment rose from about 3,800 in 2011 to roughly 5,900 at the time of the meeting, and argued the district should renew the levy now to avoid reduced credits and future revenue losses if state funding changes. The presenter told trustees: "The State's giving us less and less in their own funding model and funding vouchers more." He urged community members to support the renewal.
Courtney McKean, a parent of a special‑needs student, asked trustees to reconsider a draft flag/display policy. McKean said the policy as written could require teachers to remove visual displays that her child uses to communicate and learn and described the effect that would have on students with differing learning needs. "My student does not communicate or connect with students the same way that most neurotypical students do," McKean said. "Displays on the wall…are most critical to my student in communicating and being able to be a part of society." She asked the board to rewrite any display policy to exempt or specifically account for students who rely on classroom visuals.
Other public comments included a PTO representative inviting the community to an arts and crafts show and a parent who said involvement in district matters had led to personal legal costs and community pressure; that parent said she remains committed to engagement despite the difficulties.
Ending: Trustees did not act on the levy or the draft flag/display policy at this meeting; public comment signals areas the board may address in future policy discussions.
