Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Virtual Schools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears wide variation in Wyoming virtual academies; several districts send significant funds to private providers
Summary
Consultants and district representatives described six different district virtual programs with varied delivery models, teacher‑hiring arrangements, and fee splits; committee flagged accountability for testing and concerns about funds leaving the state.
CHEYENNE — The Select Committee on School Finance reviewed a consultant report on district virtual programs and heard district representatives describe sharply different approaches to enrollment, instruction and contracting.
Consultant testimony summarized interviews in six districts that operate virtual programs. Enrollment ranged from about 40 students to more than 700. Instruction models included fully asynchronous coursework, mostly asynchronous with a required weekly live session, daily minimum synchronous time, and wholly live classes recorded for later viewing.
Districts also differ on how teachers are hired and paid: in some places the virtual provider hires and pays teachers (the provider keeps most or all funds generated by enrolled students); in others the district hires and pays teachers; in still other arrangements the provider hires the teachers but the district pays them and deducts payroll costs before passing funds to the partner.
Richard Parker of Big Horn School District No. 1 described Wyoming Connections Academy (a Pearson affiliate) as a provider that supplies curriculum and teachers under contract; the district serves as the host and remains responsible for testing and local accountability. Several committee members asked whether 100% of generated funds flow outside the district; an intermediary said Niobrara’s contract was negotiated historically at a 100% pass‑through but later clarified by a district message that the actual split was 95% to the provider.
The consultants stressed that quality and oversight practices vary and that districts remain responsible for assessment, test administration and accountability regardless of provider arrangements. Committee members asked staff to compile additional contract details for Niobrara and other districts and to consider whether additional reporting or oversight language is appropriate in the draft recalibration bill.
— Reporting for the Select Committee on School Finance
