County Clerk Kaczmarek and her deputy told the Finance Committee that the clerks office lacks sufficient appropriated funds to complete fiscal year 2025 and that the office will be unable to fund key election and operational costs under the chairs proposed 2026 budget.

Deputy clerk presentation: The clerk's deputy said the FY25 appropriated amount was approximately $250,000–$300,000 short of the minimal funds needed to perform the offices basic duties and that the clerks projected FY26 expenses include line items that remain unfunded. The deputy identified about $1,000,000–$1,100,000 of toner, battery and postage meter purchases that could be front‑loaded into FY25 to reduce FY26 pressure; doing so would reduce a cited FY26 shortfall from roughly $3,500,000 to about $2,400,000, the deputy said.

Board reaction: Multiple board members expressed frustration and skepticism. Members said the clerk had repeatedly declined to present a formal budget in the format required by county finance staff, had not bid certain purchases (toner), and that the clerks office had previously issued raises or allocations the board viewed as unvetted. Several members noted the county has already incurred legal costs tied to litigation with the clerks office (cited at roughly $161,500 and described as growing) and said they would not approve additional appropriations without standard budgetary documentation and oversight.

Next steps and staff direction: The deputy clerk requested the committees permission to work with finance staff to craft supplemental FY25 appropriation resolutions and to present proposed amounts and purposes at the next board meeting in two weeks. Finance staff said they would work with the clerk to prepare specific numbers for committee consideration.

Why it matters: The county board must provide "reasonable and necessary expenses" for the clerk to perform statutory duties, and election administration is resource‑intensive. The committee must balance those obligations against fiscal oversight responsibilities and concerns about prior spending practices and ongoing litigation costs.

What was not decided: The committee did not approve supplemental appropriations at the Oct. 28 meeting; finance staff and the clerk will prepare proposed resolutions for future consideration.