Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Events Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panama City staff ask commissioners for feedback on special events ordinance update
Summary
Staff presented an update on the citys review of the special events ordinance, describing it as one of four staff priorities for the year alongside civic alerts, a website redesign, and parking-ticket ordinance updates, and asked commissioners for practical feedback to shape proposed changes.
Staff presented an update on the citys review of the special events ordinance at a virtual Panama City Commission workshop and asked commissioners for feedback on issues staff should address.
The presentation, delivered at the start of the session, framed the ordinance review as one of four priorities for the senior team this calendar year. "Really a fourth one, it was the civic alerts, which we've already done that one. We're utilizing text messages in a much more targeted fashion to communicate with people rather than telling the whole city when one area is affected by a road closure or a water boil notice or service interruption," the staff member said, listing the completed and in-progress efforts alongside the events ordinance review.
Why it matters: City staff said the special events ordinance has not been comprehensively reviewed in about three years. Commissioners who regularly attend city events were asked to share practical concerns and operational challenges so staff can propose amendments that reflect on-the-ground needs.
Staff described the other three priorities to provide context for internal bandwidth: civic-alert improvements (completed), an ongoing website redesign intended to simplify the public site, and an update to the parking-ticket ordinance (work noted as finished). The events-ordinance review is positioned as the remaining substantive policy task that will require stakeholder input.
Commissioners and staff discussed how commissioners who frequently attend events could provide direct feedback to staff about what works and what does not at city events. Staff did not present a draft ordinance during the session; instead, they sought direction on areas to examine and groups to consult as they prepare formal recommendations.
The staff member asked commissioners to identify operational issues and stakeholders to involve in the review. No formal motion or vote was taken on changes to the ordinance during the workshop.
Looking ahead: Staff said they will incorporate commissioner feedback into a draft proposal to be presented at a future public meeting for formal consideration.
