Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Revision Historic Definitions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board forms subcommittee to research historic‑period definitions and outreach as part of code update
Summary
The board agreed to create a two‑member subcommittee with staff to research building construction dates and propose clearer definitions for the Historic Preservation District and improved outreach to property owners about permitting responsibilities.
Get email alerts on the Code Revision Historic Definitions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the Oct. 7 meeting the La Conner Historic Preservation Board directed staff to prepare materials for a broader code revision and agreed to create a two‑member advisory subcommittee to research building dates and help recommend specific definitions and outreach approaches.
Planning staff told the board that current code guidance on color and site features is vague and that commissioners lack a consistent time period or "rudder" to judge whether a color or material is historic. Staff pointed to evidence that many structures in the National Register‑listed district were built roughly between 1875 and 1915 and suggested the board could adopt clearer, date‑based definitions by district (for example, the First Street commercial area vs. Morris Street commercial area).
Commissioners supported research that would (a) identify the primary historic construction periods for each overlay area, (b) clarify which building and site features are part of façade review versus site review (fences, signage, lighting), and (c) produce low‑cost outreach materials for property owners and realtors explaining permitting responsibilities in the Historic Preservation District. Staff offered to draft a memo and to circulate resources in advance of the next meeting.
Two commissioners volunteered to serve on the subcommittee; the board asked staff to place the subcommittee on the next agenda and to return with suggested research steps and a proposed schedule. Staff noted the subcommittee work can speed future reviews by providing staff and commissioners clearer policy anchors and by encouraging property owners to coordinate paint and fence choices before work is done.
