Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Redistricting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advisory board reviews redistricting background; counsel flags "Battles" litigation implications
Summary
City counsel told the Panama City Charter Review Advisory Board that a prior lawsuit (the Battles litigation) produced a court-ordered majority-minority single-member district. The board discussed how any move to at-large elections or changes in warding would need to account for the order and Voting Rights Act considerations.
PANAMA CITY — City counsel and staff briefed the charter review advisory board on the legal background that shapes any change to warding or election method.
Nevin, the city—s attorney, summarized the history: the city previously shifted between wards and at-large systems, and an earlier lawsuit resulted in a settlement or judgment that established single-member districts and a majority-minority district. Counsel said the Battles litigation and related ACLU/NAACP involvement factored into the most recent redistricting decisions and would be directly relevant if the advisory board recommended returning to an at-large system or otherwise changing warding language in the charter.
Board members asked whether the litigation remains binding and how a charter provision would interact with a court order. Counsel advised that the status quo is compliance with the court order and that any change to at-large language in the charter would require careful legal review because the court ordering and federal Voting Rights Act protections could constrain local changes.
Discussion highlights
- Counsel noted the redistricting that followed the last census and hurricane-driven demographic changes in the Glenwood area created population imbalances that prompted NAACP involvement and a redistricting effort. - Board members asked whether an at-large charter amendment could be inserted and cautioned that the effect of recent federal litigation and court decisions could complicate unilateral local action.
Next steps
Counsel and staff will stay involved as the board drafts language so the advisory board can identify whether proposed charter changes are legally feasible and whether additional legal steps would be required.
Provenance
This article is anchored on counsel—s briefing beginning at 00:04:53 and related discussion through later references to the Battles litigation and NAACP letters.
