Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ambulance Purchase topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Buckfield weighs up to $430,000 loan to replace aging ambulance
Summary
A warrant article would authorize the town treasurer to obtain a loan up to $430,000 to purchase or remount an ambulance to replace a 2012 Ford F-450 ambulance with high engine hours; residents and staff debated repair vs. replacement, reserves, vendor timelines and rental costs.
Get email alerts on the Ambulance Purchase topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Town of Buckfield asked voters on Nov. 4 whether to authorize the town treasurer to obtain a loan not to exceed $430,000 and to authorize the manager and select board to purchase a new ambulance.
Town staff told the Oct. 21 hearing that the current unit is a 2012 Ford F-450 with about 12,000 engine hours (presented as roughly equivalent to 360,000 miles). Quotes to repair or remount the vehicle ranged from several thousand dollars for short-term repairs to six figures for remounts; last reliable remount estimates discussed at the meeting included figures near $179,000 (previous estimates varied) and remount lead times were described by vendors as roughly 3–4 months once a spot is secured.
The town currently holds a capital asset reserve with $111,002.54 available; managers said that reserve would be applied toward the purchase or remount but would not cover a full new-vehicle purchase at the high end of estimates. Board members and residents discussed options including paying for repairs (no guarantee of longevity), purchasing a used ambulance, remounting a chassis, or borrowing up to the $430,000 cap to preserve flexibility. One official said rental ambulances cost about $125 per day (approximately $50,000 per year) as a contingency if a unit is unavailable.
Residents pressed for clarity on past vendor communications and on why repairs were not performed in real time; staff said the vehicle had been out of service since May and that contracting and remount timelines, plus available stock of used units, complicated a timely replacement.
At the Oct. 21 meeting the select board did not vote to borrow funds; the loan authorization is presented to voters on Nov. 4 so the board can retain flexibility between remount, used purchase, or new purchase depending on vendor quotes and availability.

