Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Living Shorelines topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves VIMS living‑shoreline project in Gloucester after neighbor protest
Summary
The commission approved VIMS’ York River living‑shoreline project (rock spur and breakwater with sand backfill and plantings) after a protest from an adjacent owner who warned it would erode his beach. Staff and the applicant argued the design will trap sand and stabilize the shoreline; two commissioners abstained and the motion carried.
The Virginia Marine Resources Commission approved a Virginia Institute of Marine Science project to construct a 110‑foot spur and a 135‑foot breakwater with clean‑sand backfill and native wetland plantings along the York River at the VIMS Gloucester Point campus. Staff recommended approval, finding the project is a living‑shoreline design consistent with state policy and that the rock structures will trap sand rather than erode neighboring parcels.
An adjacent property owner, Larry Wilson, testified in opposition. Wilson told the commission the bulkhead at his property is not failing, that he has a sandy beach currently, and that he fears the riprap and breakwater will accelerate sand loss on his parcel and harm future buyers. He requested guarantees against adverse effects to his property and raised concerns about a recent drainage installation on neighboring parcels.
VIMS’ representative, Neville Reynolds, said the project would buttress an existing failing groin and continue to accrete sand on the adjacent parcel; he cited aerial photography and sediment‑transport analysis in support of the design. Commissioners questioned whether the rock would encroach on private property; staff clarified the structure will stop at the property line.
The commission voted to approve the VIMS proposal as submitted. Two commissioners abstained from that vote; the motion carried (recorded abstentions noted in the meeting minutes). Staff said the design is intended to comply with the Commonwealth’s living‑shorelines preference for erosion protection and that required permits and monitoring provisions will apply.
