Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Graduation Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears first reading of state-aligned competency-determination policy that adds mastery requirement
Summary
School leaders reviewed a first reading of a revised competency-determination policy that separates completion of coursework from demonstration of mastery, adds a U.S. history coursework requirement, and lists assessment pathways (final assessment, portfolio, benchmark) and an appeals process for students who do not show mastery.
The committee heard a first reading of an updated competency-determination policy intended to align district graduation requirements with recent state guidance.
District administrators explained the policy now separates two elements: completion of required coursework and demonstration of mastery. The policy clarifies that students must complete required credits (unchanged) and also demonstrate mastery in specific subject areas. Mastery may be demonstrated through a course final assessment, a department benchmark assessment, or a portfolio review; administrators said the district expects to primarily use final assessments but must provide the alternatives called for in state guidance.
Administrators noted a new explicit requirement to include successful completion of a U.S. history course among graduation-coursework expectations for the class of 2027. The policy also calls for specific provisions and supports for English learners, students with disabilities, late enrollees, and students who previously left school without meeting competency requirements. An appeals process was outlined for students seeking review of competency or mastery determinations.
Committee members asked whether prior MCAS scores (if taken) could be used as evidence of mastery; administrators said MCAS could be considered in rare cases but the state emphasizes local mastery demonstrations now that MCAS is no longer the required path.
This was a first reading; the item will return for a second reading and possible adoption at the next meeting.
Provenance: Policy discussion began with an introduction and detailed staff presentation during the item listed as the competency determination policy first reading (presentation start ~00:23:14; discussion concluded ~00:46:23).
