Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Bill to require Natural Resources Commission livestreaming framed as transparency measure

October 30, 2025 | 2025 House Legislature MI, Michigan


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Bill to require Natural Resources Commission livestreaming framed as transparency measure
Representative Tim Fairbairn told the committee he would submit a substitute to change the bill language from "live video conference" to "live video stream" and described House Bill 48 22 as a transparency and access measure for the Natural Resources Commission (NRC). "I have introduced this bill in the interest of governmental transparency and access to the public," Fairbairn said, noting the NRC's regulatory authority over hunting, trapping and sport fishing.

Fairbairn said the NRC's decisions affect a multibillion-dollar outdoor economy and hundreds of thousands of jobs; the bill would require livestreaming of NRC meetings, searchable meeting archives on the department website, and that meeting agendas and livestream links be posted not less than 24 hours in advance. He said the bill is modeled on current practice in legislative committees and local governments that already make meeting information available online.

Committee members asked whether the bill would require the NRC to accept public comment during livestreams or merely provide viewing access; Fairbairn said the measure is focused on watching meetings and that it would not mandate public-comment procedures. Members also asked about technology and resource implications; Fairbairn said he expected the NRC to have basic equipment and that the department would be available to coordinate implementation.

Cards read into the record included neutral/no-position from Department of Natural Resources staff and support from hunting and conservation organizations. The committee did not take a final vote on HB 48 22 during this session; testimony and support/neutral cards were entered into the record.

Provenance: First related remarks at 00:59:22 when the committee took up HB 48 22; last related remarks read cards and moved on at 01:05:03.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Michigan articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI