Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commission Business topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic Preservation Commission reviews awards, trainings and advisory appointments; schedules next meeting
Summary
Commission discussed curb-appeal awards and website postings, the CLG forum, historic district signage planning, introduction of Downtown Washington director Becky Pate as an advisory participant, and set the next meeting for Monday, Nov. 10 at 6 p.m. A motion to adjourn passed by voice vote.
The Washington Historic Preservation Commission reviewed routine administrative business including curb-appeal awards, upcoming trainings, signage initiatives for the historic district and an advisory role for the Downtown Washington director.
Staff and commissioners said nominations and winners for recent curb-appeal awards have been forwarded to staff (Aileen) for posting to the commission’s website. Commissioners discussed maintaining a target of roughly six curb-appeal recognitions per year and the process for receiving nominations. One address discussed in that context was referenced as 1322 (Fifth Street), and Winters’ property was noted as having been handled by staff.
Staff announced the Certified Local Government (CLG) forum on Oct. 24 in “Just City” (as stated in the transcript). Commissioners also discussed coordinating with the Downtown Washington design group on historic district signage and noted the intention to order signage within the current budget year.
Commissioners introduced Becky Pate as the new Downtown Washington director; discussion clarified that the advisory, non-voting seat typically associated with the Downtown Washington director does not require a council vote and the mayor has final appointment authority. Commissioners agreed staff should follow up to finalize the advisory arrangement.
The commission received a brief budget report stating no notable changes. With no further business, members set the next meeting for Monday, Nov. 10 at 6 p.m.; a motion to adjourn was moved, seconded and approved by voice vote.
No formal votes beyond the adjournment voice vote and the previously recorded design-review approvals were recorded in the meeting minutes provided in the transcript.
