Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Amberly Woods Pud topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves Amberly Woods preliminary plat, accepts parkland dedication
Summary
Forest Lake City Council approved the Amberly Woods preliminary plat and planned-unit development, which includes about 56 single-family homes and a proposed parkland dedication of roughly 6–7 acres.
Get email alerts on the Amberly Woods Pud topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Forest Lake City Council on Monday approved the Amberly Woods preliminary plat and planned-unit development application from Twin Cities Land Development, authorizing Resolution 10-27-25-01 with five conditions and seven attachments.
Planner Abby presented the proposal for a new neighborhood, Amberly Woods, on land currently owned by the Serene family. The plan proposes about 56 single-family homes on 38.96 acres with a stated net developable acreage of roughly 17 acres after accounting for wetlands and wetland buffers, producing a proposed net density of about 3.3 units per acre. Approximately 6 to 7 acres on the east side of the site are proposed to be dedicated to the city as parkland; staff said the parks commission recommended acceptance of the dedication.
The applicant requested permission to include 55-foot-wide lots that are slightly smaller than the city's typical minimum lot area (7,500 square feet). Staff said that, in evaluating a planned-unit development, the council must weigh any development concessions against public benefits; in this case staff highlighted the parkland dedication, connectivity and conformance with the comp plan density standard as public benefits supporting the PUD.
Staff outlined five conditions that must be addressed in final plans: engineering plan corrections, payment of watershed-district fees, inclusion of required easements on the final plat (including utility and potential roadway easements), a development agreement assigning responsibility for public infrastructure improvements, and explicit wetland-buffer disclosures to future homeowners. Staff also said a mass-grading early-release request from the developer may appear at a future meeting.
Council discussed planning commission concerns about 55-foot lots and noted the Met Council's role in density calculations; several council members said smaller lots can support affordability while others expressed reservations. After discussion, council moved and approved the resolution authorizing the preliminary plat and PUD with the staff-recommended conditions.
Council members asked staff to continue discussions with the Met Council about how developable acreage is calculated during the upcoming comprehensive-plan cycle.

