Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident criticizes board and coaches after wrestling controversy, calls for condemnation of favoritism
Summary
During public comment, a resident criticized coaches and a board member for public statements perceived as favoring one athlete, and urged the board to condemn remarks that suggest unequal treatment of students.
A resident, Dave Andrews, used the public-comment period on Oct. 20 to criticize remarks made during a previous meeting about granting exceptions for a single athlete, calling the comments 'embarrassing' and 'unacceptable.' Andrews said such statements signal to other students that they "aren't worth it yet" and urged the board to condemn remarks made publicly by a coach and at least one board member.
Andrews referenced language from a prior meeting in which a speaker described a student as "special" and suggested making exceptions for that student; he said a coach publicly stated he would not return to ask for similar accommodations in the future because he does not have that talent coming up. Andrews said the tone of those public statements was damaging to overall student equity and urged the board to clarify its position.
Board members did not take formal action during the public-comment period; Andrews asked that board members respond via email or other channels if they did not approve of the prior statements.
