Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reopens and then tables review of Boettcher driveway after new compliance concerns
Summary
Commissioners on Oct. 7 voted to reconsider a recently approved driveway access for Mr. Boettcher after new information from Public Works suggested work began before final permit issuance and the installed culvert may be the wrong size.
The Goodhue County Board on Oct. 7 reopened consideration of a recently approved driveway access for a Boettcher property after Public Works and Land Use reported potential post‑approval violations.
Board member Linda asked to reconsider the action taken at the prior meeting, saying "there were numerous violations that came up since that meeting" and that Public Works found the culvert size was not accurate and that the owner had begun work before final approval was issued. The board voted on the motion to reconsider the previous action; the chair recorded the results as "3, 1 and 1" (three in favor, one opposed, one abstention), placing the item back on the agenda for potential action.
County legal/staff options described to the board included a motion to rescind the prior approval (which would require a supermajority), a motion to amend the prior motion or continuing the matter to a future meeting to allow staff to gather more information, speak with the landowner and complete the record. Multiple commissioners expressed concern that the driveway had been built prior to issuance of a permit and that the culvert was sized incorrectly and would need removal and replacement if found noncompliant. One commissioner said that rescinding would halt further driveway work immediately but noted the driveway already exists physically.
After extended debate about fairness to the landowner, enforcement resources and timing of land‑use hearings, Commissioner Linda moved to table the matter to the next meeting and request reports from Land Use and Public Works and for Mr. Boettcher to be given notice and an opportunity to attend. The motion to table (continue to the next meeting) was seconded and "carries" by voice vote; no precise roll call was recorded in the transcript. Staff told the board they would notify the owner and work to clarify permit and zoning steps, and that weather and seasonal constraints could affect corrective work.
No final rescission or revocation was adopted at the Oct. 7 meeting; the board specifically asked staff to investigate, speak with the owner and return with information at the next meeting.
