Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Abuse Settlement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves $828 million settlement in historic child‑abuse claims; county details corrective actions and fraud reviews
Summary
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved an $828 million settlement for roughly 414 plaintiffs alleging historical abuse in county care. County counsel and executive staff described a three‑level fraud‑review process, a new reporting hotline, expedited investigative procedures, and personnel reforms aimed at preventing future abuse.
Los Angeles County supervisors on Oct. 28 voted 5‑0 to approve a proposed settlement of approximately $828 million for about 414 plaintiffs who alleged sexual abuse while in county juvenile justice or child welfare settings.
County Counsel and the chief executive's office told the board the settlement includes enhanced vetting to screen for fraudulent claims and described operational reforms aimed at preventing future abuse. "There are three levels of review," County Counsel said, outlining a first level of questionnaire verification, a second level with allocator interviews and targeted reviews, and a newly added third level to examine recruiter‑driven claims and related documentation.
The nut graf: The action closes one chapter of long‑running litigation created in part by AB 218, while county leaders detailed steps the county is taking to make it easier to report suspected abuse and to speed and strengthen investigations. Those steps include a countywide hotline and website, a process for expedited investigations with a targeted 90‑day investigative window for timely complaints, mandatory training and a proposed board policy to reinforce zero tolerance for child sexual abuse by county workers.
County risk staff described the immediate corrective measures: a contract with a third‑party vendor to host a 24/7 reporting hotline and website, an interagency triage protocol (CEO risk management, DHR, County Counsel and sheriff's security operations) to assign investigations within three business days, and an expedited investigative process that can lead to ordered absence, referral to the district attorney and termination if allegations are substantiated.
Lisa Garrett, director of personnel, outlined a strengthened zero‑tolerance policy for child‑abuse and a mandatory training rollout for employees, contractors, volunteers and commissioners. "The policy calls for the discharge for substantiated cases of child sexual abuse," Garrett said, and the county plans an accompanying training and marketing campaign to ensure staff and partners know reporting obligations.
County counsel said the settlement structure balances justice for victims against fiscal prudence and noted the extraordinary legal and evidentiary constraints created by AB 218 — including the statute's allowance of decades‑old claims that can lack contemporaneous evidence. Counsel emphasized that no claimant will receive payment until the layered vetting and allocator review are complete; fraudulent claims identified through the process would receive no payout.
Supervisors pressed for details on ongoing employment investigations and for assurances that employees who might present an ongoing risk to youth are removed from duties involving children while inquiries proceed. Department leaders said they have identified hundreds of names for review, that many subjects are no longer county employees, and that a subset remain under investigation or on ordered absence. The probation department reported it had opened roughly 161 investigations tied to the matters and was completing the remaining inquiries.
Ending: The board approved the settlement, directed continued legislative and operational work to tighten protections and vetting, and asked for ongoing updates on investigations, hotline operations and the implementation of countywide reforms.
