Parents, students and staff press Christina School District on safety and abuse-reporting procedures
Loading...
Summary
Multiple public commenters, including a parent, a high-school student and an employee, urged the board to improve safety measures and clarify the district’s abuse-reporting process; the superintendent said staff would follow up with the concerned speakers offline.
Several members of the community used the public comment period to press the Christina School Board on school safety and how the district handles reports of abuse, calling for clearer protocols and better communication.
Tiffany Smith, a parent, described an incident at Christiana High School in which her son was a victim and said she obtained video that shows multiple alleged victims and bystander behavior. “I will be here every board meeting until you guys do something to, assure the safety of the children,” Smith said. She asked about the status of metal detectors and said she had not received notification about charges or parent outreach related to the incident.
Addison Shepherd, a student at Christiana High School, told the board a student “brandish[ed] what appear[ed] to be a weapon” and said the school was not placed on lockdown during the incident. Shepherd also described routine security lapses she said she has observed, including exterior doors left unlocked during the day and bathroom access restricted so widely that many students must use the nurse’s office. She recounted a prior bomb threat during which she said she was left unsupervised in a shed because a supervising teacher had been called away.
A district employee, Betty Millar, urged the board to address unresolved concerns about how abuse allegations are investigated. “It has now been over five months since I first came before this board seeking accountability and clarity in how this district handles abuse allegations,” Millar said. She told the board the reporting process remains unclear, that key individuals had not been interviewed, and that decisions labeled “unfounded” followed what she called an incomplete process.
Superintendent Dr. Joiner acknowledged the public comments and told speakers that a member of the district team would follow up. At one exchange the president noted, “Doctor Joiner will do that offline,” and Dr. Joiner reiterated the district’s intent to contact commenters and support them.
The transcript does not record the board adopting any immediate policy changes or formal motions in response to the comments. Board members and staff said they would follow up, and Dr. Joiner later invited affected commenters to meet with staff in the hallway after the meeting. The record does not specify timelines for any investigation updates or whether video evidence discussed by commenters will be reviewed publicly; the transcript notes the request and the district’s commitment to follow up but does not provide outcomes within the meeting record.
The concerns raised include specific operational items (metal detectors, door security, visitor check-in, bathroom access and supervision during emergencies) and systemic questions about abuse-reporting timelines and investigative completeness. Those issues will require staff review and possible policy or procedural changes beyond the meeting’s public-comment period.
