Christina School Board declares District F seat vacant under new state residency law
Loading...
Summary
The board voted 4–2–1 to declare the District F seat vacant, citing recently enacted state residency requirements in HB 82. The motion prompted extended debate about the member’s service, constituency outreach, and whether the measure was being applied fairly.
The Christina School Board voted to declare the District F seat vacant under subchapter 3, chapter 10, title 14 of the Delaware Code, commonly cited in the meeting as HB 82. The motion, made by Douglas Manley and seconded by Dr. Amy Trauth, passed by roll call 4 yes, 2 no, 1 abstention.
Board members who supported the motion said the new law requires a member to be an inhabitant of the district they represent for at least 75% of the year, and they reported that District F member Naveed Baqir had not set foot in Delaware since January 2024. “HB 82 … requires that a school board member be an inhabitant of the district that they represent for at least 75% of the year,” a board member said during discussion, urging that the board follow the law.
Opponents framed the vote as a targeted political campaign against Baqir and defended his record of constituent service. Monica Moriac described Baqir as “dedicated to his community” and said he brought more than 100 new families into the district, which she said benefited district finances. Baqir spoke to the board before the vote, saying he had continued to serve constituents despite physical absence and that the public attacks included racial and religious undertones. “Despite my physical distance, my commitment to the district has never wavered,” Baqir said.
Board members also raised legal and fiscal concerns about possible lawsuits if the board failed to act. After debate, the chair called for a roll-call vote. The board recorded four votes in favor, two against and one abstention; the meeting minutes show the motion carried.
The board did not adopt language beyond the declaration during the meeting about next procedural steps to fill the vacancy; the transcript records the declaration and the vote but does not specify the timeline or appointment process to replace the seat.
The decision drew both public comment earlier in the meeting — including a speaker who urged the board to remove Baqir — and extended in-meeting discussion about fairness and precedent. Board members emphasized that the action was taken under state law rather than as a character judgment.
The board’s action is recorded in the meeting minutes and on the livestreamed record. Any legal challenges or subsequent processes required by state law were not resolved during the meeting.
