Citizen Portal
Sign In

Pennridge reports mixed 2024–25 results: strong AP metrics, statewide ELA declines and targeted school plans

Pennridge School District Policy/Curriculum/Student Services Committees · November 3, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Pennridge presented 2024–25 student performance data showing rising AP participation and high AP pass rates but ELA declines mirroring statewide trends; district leaders outlined targeted interventions to address the gaps.

District data leaders presented a full 2024–25 analytics briefing covering PSSA, Keystone, PVAS growth measures, AP participation, NOCTE and district demographics.

Highlights: AP participation increased with 35% of the graduating class taking at least one AP course and 27% earning a qualifying AP score; 93% of district AP exam takers earned a 3 or higher in 2025. NOCTE results for students at the Bucks County Technical School showed about 85% of test‑takers were competent or advanced. District leaders also reported strong co‑curricular participation (arts and athletics) and scholarships awarded (more than $3.5 million in 2024–25).

Challenges: Pennsylvania‑wide declines in ELA were reflected in the district. Dr. Palmer said 98% of districts using the Lincoln assessment vendor showed no measurable ELA progress in 2024–25; statewide grades 3–8 declines were in the 3%–8% range. Keystone literature proficiency dipped; algebra and biology showed gains. Disaggregated results showed lower proficiency among special education, English learner and free/reduced‑lunch students. Dr. Palmer and principals emphasized the need for targeted Tier‑1 instruction, strengthened eligible‑content alignment, ninth‑grade benchmarks and professional learning focused on vocabulary, close reading and evidence‑based writing (Say‑Mean‑Matter).

School principals presented sample school plans with measurable targets (e.g., improve key ideas and details and craft/structure scores) and described scheduled professional development, use of data teams, and interventions such as algebra enrichment and dual‑credit/dual‑enrollment supports. District staff committed to county and state peer comparisons when the state data are publicly released and promised follow‑up reports and localized root‑cause analyses for lower performing subgroups.