Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Harnett County elections office reviews $43,000-per-site ballot-on-demand quote for early voting

Harnett County Board of Elections · November 4, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Elections staff presented a vendor quote for ballot-on-demand printing that could reduce ballot ordering waste and errors but carries substantial up-front cost. The board discussed piloting the technology and asked staff to compare long-term savings versus the capital outlay.

Elections staff presented a vendor quote for ballot-on-demand printers as a potential way to reduce ballot ordering errors and waste during early voting.

The quote from Printelex covered equipment sized to support six check-in stations at a single early-voting site and was presented to the board as an estimated capital cost of about $43,000 per site. The director said the county could pilot the system at one precinct or scale the number of check-in stations to lower initial expenditure.

Why it matters: Harnett County must order many different ballot styles for primaries and other elections because unaffiliated voters may choose a partisan ballot at check-in; purchasing on-demand printing could eliminate the need to stock double (or more) quantities of every ballot style and reduce the risk of poll-worker errors that produce wrong ballot styles at the table.

Board discussion: board members asked how the printers would integrate with existing check-in systems and whether the speed would match current processes. Staff explained the voter check-in laptop would send the ballot print job to a separate printer; voters would still sign the check-in device (ATV) but receive a printed ballot from the on-demand printer. The director said a full cost-benefit comparison is pending and will be included for a future meeting.

Next steps: staff will prepare a fiscal comparison of estimated savings on balloting versus initial capital costs and return to the board with a recommendation. No purchase decision was made at this meeting.