Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Scottsdale council unanimously authorizes city attorney to pursue counterclaims in lawsuit, contingent on deadlines
Summary
On Nov. 3 the Scottsdale City Council voted unanimously to authorize the interim city attorney to file counterclaims, cross-claims and third-party claims in the litigation listed on the special-meeting agenda — unless stipulated court deadlines are extended.
Scottsdale, Ariz. — On Nov. 3 the Scottsdale City Council voted unanimously to authorize the interim city attorney to file counterclaims, cross-claims and third-party claims in the litigation listed on the special-meeting agenda — "Taxpayers Against Awful Apartment Zoning Exemptions et al. v. State of Arizona, City of Scottsdale, et al." — unless stipulated deadlines are extended by the court.
The authorization, moved by Vice Mayor Adam Kwasman and seconded (second not named on the public record), directs city counsel to proceed with “prescribed claims” and requires the item to be agendized for the Nov. 17 regular meeting. Kwasman amended his original language to substitute the word “extended” for “excluded” to clarify the council’s intent.
Why it matters: the item on the special-meeting agenda referenced state legislation and local land-use documents that are central to the case, including references in the public record to Senate Bill 1543, House Bill 2721 and…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

