Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Time Change topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission deadlocks on changing meeting time; discussion tabled to next meeting after multiple substitute motions
Summary
Commissioners debated changing the regular meeting start time (currently 4:00 p.m.). Multiple substitute motions were proposed (keep 4:00, move to 5:00, 5:30 or 6:00), commissioners raised Brown Act and public-noticing concerns and opinions about public attendance, and the commission voted to continue/table the discussion until the next meeting.
Get email alerts on the Meeting Time Change topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A lengthy debate over the commission’s regular meeting time dominated the agenda as several commissioners proposed changing the start time from 4:00 p.m. to alternative times. Commissioners proposed substitute motions — including 5:00 p.m., 5:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. — and argued both for accommodating working residents and for preserving current participation by commissioners who have daytime obligations.
"I’d like to make a vote to keep the time at 04:00," one commissioner said. Other commissioners countered that a later start helps working residents attend. The conversation included procedural confusion over substitute motions, seconding and whether votes should wait for absent commissioners. A commissioner asked whether emailed public comments submitted for a canceled meeting were properly handled and whether the situation raised any Brown Act concerns; staff said the public-comment inbox is monitored by multiple staff members and that legal review was being consulted.
After multiple proposals and seconded substitutes, the commission ultimately voted to table the time-change discussion to the next meeting. The commission recorded both affirmative and opposing voices on the record; some commissioners objected to tabling and said they would prefer the absent members participate. Staff reminded the commission that any advisory recommendation would ultimately go to city council for final approval and that emailed votes from absent members are not allowed.
Why it matters: Changing meeting times can affect commissioner participation, public access and the practical ability of working residents and artists to attend. Commissioners noted the limits of advisory authority: the commission can recommend a time but the city council must approve any official change.
What’s next: the commission tabled the item to the next meeting so absent members can attend and the commission can decide with broader participation; staff will prepare a staff report for council if the commission moves forward with a recommendation.
Provenance: dispute and motions begin at 00:39:08 with substitute motions interspersed through the meeting; the final tabled motion was recorded at about 01:08:00.

