Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Equestrian Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission delays decision on proposed equestrian rules, continues deliberations to Oct. 21
Summary
After hours of public testimony and extensive questioning of staff, the Kitsap County Planning Commission voted to postpone further deliberations on proposed equestrian facility code changes to an Oct. 21 meeting. The item drew sustained public comment centered on transparency, complaint data and whether new rules would be retroactive.
The Kitsap County Planning Commission on Oct. 7 voted to continue deliberations on proposed equestrian (equine) facility code changes to a special meeting on Oct. 21.
The commission took the action after a lengthy staff presentation and a multi-hour public-comment session in which dozens of residents and representatives of equestrian organizations urged greater transparency and asked the county to release its complaint records. A motion to postpone further deliberations to Oct. 21 was made, seconded and approved by voice vote.
Planning staff said they will continue to refine a deliberations matrix and draft language before the next meeting. Heather Cleveland, the county’s long-range planner and lead on the "Year of the Rural" project, told commissioners she and staff are "weaving" public comments into the next draft and plan to publish updates and working-group notes on the project web page. She also said the equestrian code under discussion would not be retroactive and would apply to new or expanded commercial equestrian facilities above thresholds the county is still defining.
Commissioners pressed staff for documentary evidence of the problems the code is intended to address. Scott Diener, planning manager, described the county’s complaint-driven compliance model and the limits of current staff capacity: "We don't go out looking for code compliance issues," he said, adding that code-enforcement records are difficult to mine quickly but staff will try to summarize the complaints they can locate.
Public speakers repeatedly asked that any proposed restrictions not be adopted without clearer evidence that the problems are widespread. "There is no way on God's green earth that anything that was discussed there should be moving forward in any capacity," said Eric Olson, a South Colby resident. Members of the equestrian working group and other residents said they have asked staff for a compiled list of complaints and outcomes and had not received it. Jessie Olson, a working-group member, said after the meeting, "we were all incredibly disappointed on how that meeting went."
The commission’s postponement does not change other elements of the "Year of the Rural" package, which staff are continuing to refine and will present again during the scheduled deliberation timeline. The next Planning Commission meeting on this item is set for Oct. 21; staff said updated drafts and the working-group schedule will be posted on the county "Year of the Rural" web page in advance.
Votes at a glance: Motion to postpone deliberations to Oct. 21 — moved (not specified), seconded (not specified); approved by voice vote. The commission earlier adopted the evening’s agenda and minutes by voice vote earlier in the meeting.
