Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Speakers ask Dearborn to review ties between city procurements and vendors linked to Cellebrite; council to review
Summary
Public commenters asked the council to pause procurement involving companies with financial or service ties to Cellebrite, citing human‑rights concerns and previous city divestment resolutions. Council acknowledged the concern and staff said procurement records and divestment policies would be reviewed.
Get email alerts on the Procurement Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the Oct. 21 meeting, several residents raised concerns about procurement links between U.S. vendors and Cellebrite, an Israeli digital forensics company cited by commenters for alleged use in overseas operations.
Ziyad Abdul Malik and other speakers told the council recent Axon investments in Cellebrite and vendor relationships used in police evidence systems could expose residents — and diaspora families traveling abroad — to risks tied to human‑rights abuses. Malik asked the city to pause procurements and extend the city’s 2024 divestment principles to include contracts and suppliers, not only investment funds.
Council members acknowledged the concern and said the earlier 2024 divestment resolution had focused on investment funds; they asked staff to review procurement practices, the specifics of the city’s recently approved evidence and body‑camera contracts, and whether additional ethical screens are appropriate. No procurement action was rescinded or paused at the meeting.
What happened next: Council asked administration and legal to review the procurement records and to report back to the council. Residents asked for a pause while that review proceeds; the council requested information but did not enact a pause.
Why this matters: The comments raised the question of whether municipal ethical standards used for investments should also apply to procurement decisions for public safety technology. The council directed staff review rather than making an immediate procurement decision.

