Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Activities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District resists adopting Neola's crowdfunding language; debates handling of nondistrict student activity accounts
Summary
Board members recommended keeping the district's existing fundraising controls rather than adopting Neola's crowdfunding language, and extensively debated whether nondistrict student activity accounts (examples: Equestrian Club) should be housed or managed by the district.
Elkhorn Area School District board and staff debated student fundraising and the treatment of student activity accounts, recommending the district retain its existing fundraising procedures rather than adopting Neola's crowdfunding language.
During the meeting staff contrasted the district's current practice (referenced as a "class immunity" approach in the transcript) with Neola's crowdfunding language, which they said would broadly lump numerous fundraising activities into a crowdfunding definition. Participants expressed concern that Neola's text did not reflect the district's existing review and approval steps and recommended not adopting the Neola crowdfunding paragraph at this time.
The group then discussed nondistrict-supported student activity accounts, citing the Equestrian Club as an example of a group that sought school affiliation for competitive reasons but did not want district financial oversight. Board members said the district does not generally want to serve as the fiscal manager for outside community groups and warned that allowing nondistrict accounts to be housed without oversight could be misused. Participants described that the district has offered an umbrella option for some community groups (youth sports, boosters) but many groups decline because they do not want oversight.
For district-sponsored student activities (fund 21 accounts), members agreed those should remain under district financial management. The transcript records discussion of administrative options for handling inactive accounts, with a suggested approach to transfer unexpended senior-class funds to the freshman class (or to the general fund after one year of inactivity for other accounts) to keep accounts current.
No formal votes were recorded in the transcript; staff were asked to confirm whether to retain existing fundraising procedures and to draft language about nondistrict account handling and disposition of inactive funds.
