Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Bill would cut CPL renewal fee to $30; supporters call current fees a financial barrier

November 06, 2025 | 2025 House Legislature MI, Michigan


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Bill would cut CPL renewal fee to $30; supporters call current fees a financial barrier
Representative Paquette presented House Bill 4284, which would lower the concealed pistol license renewal fee to $30 to better align with the administrative cost of processing renewals. He said renewal fees vary by county (reported examples ranged from roughly $8 to $28 per county for processing) and noted Michigan’s $115 renewal fee places the state among the highest in the nation.

Paquette said county processing costs differ and that the state police’s electronic option could incur additional costs that the Michigan State Police (MSP) should absorb in its budget rather than being passed to applicants. ‘‘I could say that I'm kinda like a grandpa on his porch shouting about how renewal fees for CPLs are too dang high,’’ Paquette said, summarizing his pitch.

Representatives of firearm‑owner and training organizations testified in support. Witnesses said high fees can be a barrier for low‑income applicants, women (who now make a larger share of CPL holders), seniors and residents in high‑crime areas. Brady Schickinger (Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners) and others argued lowering fees would encourage compliance and reduce carrying on expired licenses, which is a felony under current law.

Tom Lambert and Casey Armitage (Michigan Open Carry) provided historical context on fee revenues and reporting by the state police and said aligning fees with actual costs reduces the risk of legal challenges; Lambert cited state police reporting that showed a sizable margin between revenue and reported expenses for the state police portion of fees.

Supporters urged the committee to advance the bill; Rep Paquette and proponents said they are willing to work on technical details and county reporting to ensure the fee tracks administrative costs. The transcript shows testimony and questions but does not record a committee vote on the bill during this session.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Michigan articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI