Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Permit Revocation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Zoning board reinstates permit for 1417 Q Street auto body shop with added conditions
Summary
The Allentown Zoning Hearing Board on Oct. 27 granted an appeal and reinstated a zoning permit for an auto body shop at 1417 Q Street, adding conditions intended to prevent customer vehicles from parking outside the building.
The Allentown Zoning Hearing Board on Oct. 27 granted an appeal by the operator of an auto body shop at 1417 Q Street, overturning a zoning officer’s revocation and reinstating the 2008 Zoning Hearing Board decision with additional conditions intended to prevent outside vehicle parking.
City counsel Attorney Rosenthal told the board the revocation arose from a violation of Condition 2 of the board’s 2008 decision, which requires that “all customers’ cars being serviced or awaiting to be serviced shall be parked on the inside of the building and not on the outside.” The city presented time-stamped doorbell-camera photos showing vehicles left on the street and said that evidence prompted the notice of revocation.
The city proposed several added conditions, and the applicant, represented by Anthony Bertha of Motion Development, agreed to the changes. Key new obligations include maintaining a logbook on the premises that records vehicles served (make, model, color and the first three letters of the license plate), posting conspicuous exterior signage advising customers not to park on the street or sidewalk, and authorizing staff to contact a parking authority to tow vehicles left contrary to the approved location if owners cannot be reached.
Board members questioned how long the parking problem had persisted; the city said complaints dated back approximately a year and emphasized a preference for compliance-oriented enforcement over immediate fines. The city also noted the current operator’s permit had been issued earlier in 2025.
Chair Robert Knauer moved to approve the 2008 decision’s findings and to impose the additional conditions discussed at the hearing. The motion carried and the board directed that the zoning officer’s administrative revocation be overturned and the permit reinstated subject to the new conditions and the modified language agreed in the hearing. The decision includes an expectation that the city will pursue stronger enforcement if violations recur.
The board did not impose a fine as part of this action; city staff said that administrative fines remain a possible enforcement path if future violations are documented.
