Daytona Beach Shores amends code on city-appointed boards: term limits, nonresident rules, notice and minutes

City Commission of Daytona Beach Shores · November 5, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City Commission adopted Ordinance 2025-18 to revise code section 2-8 and the planning-and-zoning board provisions. The ordinance adds a required one-term sit-out for termed-out members, limits nonresident regular members to two and requires those nonresidents to own at least 50% interest in local property, and clarifies attendance, reconsider

The Daytona Beach Shores City Commission unanimously adopted Ordinance 2025-18 to amend city code provisions governing appointed boards, commissions and committees.

City Attorney Waters read the ordinance and staff explained the changes the commission had directed at an earlier meeting. The ordinance requires that a member who reaches the term limit must sit out at least one full three-year term before reappointment. The code will limit nonresident regular board members to a maximum of two; staff said the nonresident must own at least 50% interest in the qualifying real property in the city. The ordinance also clarifies that the section does not apply to staff committees but that staff committees must be noticed, open to the public and have minutes taken.

Additional changes include stricter attendance expectations for regular and alternate members, a reconsideration rule that permits reconsideration of non-quasi-judicial matters only at the same meeting or the meeting after and then only if made by a member on the prevailing side, and a requirement that minutes be kept for these committees. Staff recommended adoption, and the commission approved the ordinance by a 5-0 roll-call vote.

The ordinance makes implementation and procedural changes intended to increase transparency and set clearer term and residency qualifications for board members. Staff indicated these changes arose from prior commission direction and consultation with the city attorney’s office.