Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections Town Meeting topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Select Board delays decision on handheld electronic voting for Town Meeting, asks for committee and legal review

Town of Danvers Select Board · November 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After multiple town meeting members spoke in favor of handheld electronic voting, the Select Board debated forming a study committee versus immediate adoption, and ultimately voted to table the item until the first meeting in December while the town manager and legal counsel gather answers to board questions.

Town meeting members and residents urged the Select Board to adopt handheld electronic voting ("clickers") for Town Meeting, citing survey results and examples from other communities, but the board voted to postpone a decision until early December while staff and a small study group gather additional information.

What speakers said: Town meeting member Lauren Steeves summarized a voluntary survey she sent to town meeting members: "For transparency and for the record, I'll restate the survey results. 81 members responded, 52 in favor, 21 undecided, and 8 no," she said. Eddie Shrage, another town meeting member, urged adoption: "We have an opportunity to bring Danvers out of the dark ages with these handheld voting counters. ... The voters have the right to know how you vote."

Board concerns and options: Select Board members welcomed the research but raised legal and practical questions: who has authority to require electronic voting, whether the town moderator, the Select Board or Town Meeting must authorize it; how the technology would affect meeting length and logistics; year‑to‑year and ongoing costs; and whether to implement town‑wide or only for certain vote types. Some members favored immediate adoption and getting bids; others argued for a small committee and more time to resolve legal and process questions.

Action taken: The board voted to table the discussion to the first Select Board meeting in December, and the town manager agreed to collect board questions and work with legal counsel to provide answers in advance. The board asked for names of Select Board members who will serve on a 3–5 person working group to develop a draft plan and recommended questions for the town manager.

Why it matters: Electronic voting would change how Town Meeting records individual votes and could affect transparency, meeting procedure and the time needed to conduct business. Board members emphasized the need for legal review of whether the authority for any mandate lies with Town Meeting, the moderator, or the Select Board.

Attribution: Quotes and vote are taken from the public comment and board discussion recorded on the meeting transcript.