Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Proposed Dallas historic preservation code heads to planning commission after SHPO review
Summary
The commission reviewed a proposed updated Historic Preservation Code that is under SHPO/consultant review and scheduled for planning commission consideration the following day.
The Historic Preservation Commission reviewed a proposed update to the City of Dallas Historic Preservation Code and was informed the draft has been returned to consultant Curry Gill for final feedback and is scheduled for planning commission consideration the following day.
Commission Chair and Tyler (historic preservation officer) said the draft is about 16 pages and includes definitions, demolition-review procedures and detailed references to the commission and the historic preservation officer. Chair noted the draft is a substantial improvement over earlier language adopted by the council but contains proofing errors and occasional omissions of definitions that are important for consistent application.
Tyler said the city coordinated revisions with the city manager—s office and the city attorney and that Curry provided feedback; the draft will go to the planning commission for recommendation and then to the city council. Commissioners flagged one typographical error that used the phrase "historic resource officer" where the text appears to intend "historic preservation officer." Staff said the typo will be corrected before council consideration if the planning commission forwards the draft.
Commissioners discussed how the code—s provisions would affect potential projects in the historic district, including design guidance for new construction, criteria for demolition review and the historic preservation officer—s duties. Chair noted that had a measure to build a new police station in the district advanced, the commission would have a specified role in reviewing design and compatibility under the proposed code.
Why it matters: The code revision sets the procedural and substantive rules the commission will use for reviews, demolition decisions and design guidance. If adopted, the code also maintains the city—s eligibility for certain CLG-related funding and clarifies staff and commission responsibilities.
Provenance: discussion of the code begins at 00:40:01 with a reference to the "long 16 page document" and the planning commission submission is discussed at 00:44:09.
