Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Recess Rules Change topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee discusses creating a July/August council recess; legal interpretation debated
Summary
Members debated a proposed rules change to allow a council recess either for the entire month of August or covering the last meeting of July and first meeting of August. Supporters cited school schedules and National Night Out; council legal staff discussed charter interpretation and past precedents.
Get email alerts on the Council Recess Rules Change topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee members debated a proposed rules change that would allow the council to take a recess in late July/early August (alternatively a full August recess) starting next calendar year.
Chair Toons framed the proposal as responsive to the calendar of public hearings, the planning commission schedule and school start dates. "Just given how things line up both with the planning commission, but also with MNPS and schools starting... for colleagues who have school-aged children," Toons said, she intended to draft the rules change based on the committee’s feedback.
Legal staff and Director Darby said their interpretation of the charter supported a rules-based recess. Darby recalled relying on the same interpretation to omit the first meeting in January in a prior rule change: "The charter does enable us to do it through a rules change ... It says that those are the only time that we can hold regular meetings. And the charter also provides us with the authority to call special meetings..."
Council members expressed personal and practical support for a mid-summer recess. One member noted that National Night Out conflicts with the first August meeting and that a recess would enable attendance at neighborhood events. Another member said the July/early August window would be preferable to removing a different public hearing slot. The committee agreed that Chair Toons would coordinate with the council office to draft a rules change for future consideration.
The transcript does not show a formal vote to amend the rules during this meeting; members asked the chair to draft language and begin the rule-change process.

