Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident asks council about ICE activity and local law enforcement coordination

Williamsport City Council · July 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the July 10 meeting a resident, Julie Yingling, asked detailed questions about recent ICE activity in Williamsport, including detainer practices, badge concealment, data-sharing agreements, and treatment of non-English speakers. Council members offered to help connect her with the mayor's office and police for follow-up.

During public comment, resident Julie Yingling addressed the council with a multi-point list of questions about Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity in Williamsport.

Yingling identified herself and her address and asked what city officials are doing to protect residents' constitutional rights, which city departments (police, sheriff, probation) are working with ICE, whether officers have concealed badges or worn masks during operations, which office investigates allegations of ICE misconduct, whether ICE will provide public briefings for the council, whether the county sheriff's designation affects detainer practices, what Chief Snyder's policy is regarding Williamsport Bureau of Police coordination with ICE, and what data-sharing agreements exist between local law enforcement and ICE.

Council President Yoder said he did not have immediate answers to the technical questions and asked whether Yingling had previously contacted the mayor's office or police; Yingling said this was her starting point and that others had reached out to the mayor previously. Yoder offered to help make connections so Yingling could get more detailed responses from the appropriate offices. Yingling provided handouts and the council said staff would follow up.

The exchange on the record consisted of a public comment that raised multiple procedural and oversight questions and a council offer to facilitate follow-up with the mayor's office and police. No formal action, investigation, or policy change was recorded at the meeting.