Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Human Services Accounting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Human Services and finance to reconcile $334,000 allocation treatment before Nov. 17 final budget cut
Summary
Human Services and finance staff disagreed over whether a $334,000 cost‑allocation item should be shown as revenue to the Human Services fund; Human Services said it is not true revenue and asked for reclassification.
Human services leadership told the board they disagreed with the way a roughly $334,000 item was presented in the draft budget as revenue to the Human Services fund. They argued the amount is a cost‑allocation transfer and not actual revenue coming into the program and that presenting it as revenue creates a misleading picture of the fund balance.
“Tracy and I disagree that that should show as revenue… we just don't feel like it’s true revenue,” a Human Services representative said, asking that the item be shown instead as an inter‑fund transfer or otherwise reclassified so fund statements reflect the economic reality.
Finance staff acknowledged the accounting nuance and said the county will review the cost‑allocation methodology and the timing differences that produce the apparent revenue. Staff committed to examine the treatment and return with a recommendation before the Nov. 17 final cut. Commissioners asked for a clearer presentation that avoids misleading surpluses in Human Services and to ensure federal and state fiscal timing is correctly reflected.
Ending: Staff will reconcile the cost‑allocation detail and present an updated classification and fund balance estimate at the Nov. 17 budget cut.
