Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Facilities And Configuration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Manitowoc superintendent presents plan to consolidate elementary schools and adopt 5–6/7–8 middle model; board to review Nov. 25

Manitowoc Public School District (Superintendent community session) · October 29, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Superintendent Keith Dennis told a packed community session that the Manitowoc Public School District must "right-size" its building footprint after a multi-year enrollment decline and aging facilities, and presented committee recommendations that would keep four K–4 elementary schools while creating one intermediate 5–6 school and one 7–8 middle school using the district's two existing middle buildings.

Superintendent Keith Dennis told a packed community session that the Manitowoc Public School District must "right-size" its building footprint after a multi-year enrollment decline and aging facilities, and presented committee recommendations that would keep four K–4 elementary schools while creating one intermediate 5–6 school and one 7–8 middle school using the district's two existing middle buildings.

"We're not gonna do anything that's not good for kids, period," Dennis said, describing the recommendations developed by facility advisory committees that met since January. He said the district has dropped from about 5,500 students in 2017 to roughly 4,300 this year and is projected (district projection) to be near 3,500 in 10 years, figures he cited to explain the need to change the district's structure.

The committee produced dozens of options and coalesced around a model the members described as balancing school size and protecting developmental needs. The plan includes: retaining four K–4 elementary schools to keep elementary enrollments comparable to current sizes; creating a rolling-cohort middle pathway with an intermediate school for grades 5 and 6 and a separate 7–8 middle school; studying long-term architectural solutions for middle facilities; and considering closing, idling, repurposing or selling multiple elementary school buildings so capital can be reallocated to remaining schools.

Dennis said the committee's recommendations are intended to preserve program quality and staffing by reducing excess building space and redirecting capital funding. "We are already able to do the critical maintenance of the existing school buildings," he said, and said capital from decommissioned buildings could be invested in remaining schools.

Staff cited capacity and budget context in the presentation: the district has significant unused classroom capacity in some buildings, and personnel account for a little over 70 percent of the budget. Dennis also noted a recent state funding change: a planned $325 per-pupil increase was not delivered through state aid this year, shifting pressure onto local budgets.

District staff said they have prepared a FAQ and a research summary (the latter prepared by Director Eichmann) and posted materials on a new web page. The district circulated a six-minute explainer video describing research on developmental sequencing and the academic risks of moving students into new middle schools at sixth grade; the video emphasized the 5–6/7–8 split as a way to reduce the "sixth-grade slump." Dennis said the majority of questions submitted so far have been logistical rather than educational.

Timeline and next steps: Dennis said staff will "dot the i's and cross the t's" over the next two to three weeks and present detailed recommendations to the Board of Education on Nov. 25; the board will hear the recommendations and ask clarifying questions that night but is not scheduled to act then. Dennis said the board might act at a subsequent meeting in December and that, operationally, staff are preparing recommendations that assume closing two elementary schools (he said a recommendation of two schools was the district's current plan to present, though ultimate action rests with the board).

Public questions at the session touched on specific enrollments, rezoning, staffing, transportation, the fate of alternative-program space, and how the district will support communities tied to schools. Dennis read last year's elementary enrollment figures for planning context: Madison ~206, Riverview ~243, Monroe ~243, Jackson ~339, Franklin ~359, Jefferson ~353. He cited middle-school totals of roughly Wilson 479 and Washington 561 (last year's figures). He said the district will use a zoning tool developed by tech director Jessica Dupree to model rezoning scenarios and that staff intend to minimize disruption and to review attendance lines every two to three years.

On staffing, Dennis said the district cannot guarantee every employee a position if schools close but added that the district will try to retain staff where possible through attrition and placement. He noted the district reduced about 20 professional positions earlier in the year because of declining enrollment, mostly through retirements and other attrition.

On logistics, Dennis said staggered school start times and bussing would address potential conflicts for families with students in different grade bands; he said the district will review its two-mile bussing radius policy in planning. For vacated buildings, the staff recommendation categories are "repurpose, sell, idle," and specific proposals will accompany the recommendation the board receives.

Dennis closed by asking the community to stay engaged and said district contact information and a process for submitting questions are available on the new web page. He emphasized the district's intention to "celebrate the legacy" of any school that closes and to support students and staff through the transition.