Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves future land use amendment and first reading of RSF-2 zoning for 2920 South Peninsula Drive
Summary
The Daytona Beach Shores City Commission voted 3-0 to adopt a future land use map amendment for 2920 South Peninsula Drive and approved first reading of a zoning ordinance assigning RSF-2 for the same property.
The Daytona Beach Shores City Commission voted 3-0 to adopt a future land use map amendment for a property at 2920 South Peninsula Drive and approved a related zoning ordinance on first reading that would assign an RSF-2 urban single-family residential detached classification.
City Planner Gwen Herstein told the commission the property, annexed into Daytona Beach Shores on July 1, is a single-family residence owned by Andrew E. Melville and Bonnie Bay Melville (tax parcel 532709000160). She said all submission requirements and statutory criteria were met, and that the citys Planning & Zoning board recommended approval of the future land use amendment on Aug. 11. Herstein also noted the rezoning is contingent on final adoption of the future land use amendment at second reading.
The commission opened a public hearing for Ordinance 2025-10 (a comprehensive plan amendment to assign the residential low-intensity future land use) and received no public comment. A motion to approve the future land use amendment passed on a 3-0 roll call.
Following that vote, the commission conducted a quasi-judicial hearing for Ordinance 2025-11, which would modify the official zoning map to RSF-2 for the same parcel. Witnesses for the quasi-judicial hearing were sworn. Herstein said the rezoning would align the parcels zoning with similar properties and with the countys prior designation while noting that final effectiveness requires the future land use action to be completed. The commission approved the first reading of the rezoning ordinance 3-0.
Both ordinances were presented with accompanying exhibits and staff analyses; the planner stated that photos and aerial views were included in the record. No members of the public spoke at either hearing; the planner said she had attempted to contact the property owners when posting the required sign and that the owners were not present.
What happens next: Ordinance 2025-10 takes the next procedural step toward adoption; Ordinance 2025-11 will not become effective until the future land use amendment completes its second reading as required by the citys procedures.
