Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public raises media‑reporting and bullying concerns; treasurer and superintendent respond

Parma City School District Board of Education · September 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public commenters pressed the board about an erroneous media story on property tax reappraisals and voiced concern about repeated bullying of a student; the treasurer and superintendent responded with clarifications and instructions for building‑level follow‑up.

Three members of the public addressed the board during the public‑comment portion of the Sept. 25 meeting.

Martin Stancic raised a concern about an article published by cleveland.com (Plain Dealer) that reported a much larger tax‑reappraisal payment to the district than staff expected. The treasurer and district staff said the article was based on incorrect county data and that cleveland.com issued a correction after district follow‑up; the treasurer confirmed the corrected figure was substantially lower than the figure reported in the original story.

Cathy Kolobat, a grandmother of a district student, described repeated bullying of her grandson, who has autism and is reading below grade level. She described an incident in which the student was punched and said a staff member told the child to see the principal; she said the boy did not feel safe. Superintendent Dr. Hunt acknowledged the concern and said such incidents should be addressed at the building level with teachers and the principal; she offered to ensure the matter receives appropriate follow‑up.

State Representative Sean Greenstein (present at the meeting) delivered a public commendation of district staff and students, praising the district’s work to raise performance and calling the district’s outcomes a community achievement.

None of the public comments led to an immediate board vote; district staff indicated they would follow up with building administrators and the treasurer’s office would continue communicating about the funding issue.