Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Right Of Way Vacation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DRC outlines conditions for Osprey Court vacation; storm pipe, FPL facilities and bus shelter requirement noted
Summary
The DRC considered a petition to vacate Osprey Court, a roughly 4,145‑square‑foot alley used for trash collection; staff required confirmation of storm‑drain infrastructure, coordination for FPL facilities and an improved bus shelter with accessible boarding pad to preserve ADA access before the vacation becomes effective.
The DRC on Aug. 20 reviewed a request by PFI 7 21 Development LLC to vacate Osprey Court, a roughly 4,145‑square‑foot dead‑end alley south of Ringling Boulevard used primarily for trash collection that abuts properties the applicant owns.
McCare King of the law firm Icard Merrill introduced the request and summarized the alley’s current use and ownership. “The alley currently serves as a sort of trash collection, space for the properties to the north and the south, and it is a dead end street as well,” King said.
Why it matters: staff said the city will not vacate a public right‑of‑way unless public benefits and infrastructure impacts are addressed, and several technical conditions must be met before a vacation can take effect.
Key staff comments and conditions
- Utilities and storm infrastructure: Engineering reported an existing storm pipe within Osprey Court that the city GIS identifies as a large pipe (records indicate up to 48 inches) and said that if the pipe remains it will require a 20‑foot easement; if the pipe is to be rerouted the rerouted system must be installed and fully operational before the right‑of‑way is vacated.
- FPL and other utilities: Planning noted correspondence from FPL that facilities are located in the right‑of‑way; the applicant must provide additional information and either record agreements or pursue relocations as necessary.
- Transit and accessibility: Traffic staff said the alley currently provides space used to deploy bus ramps at nearby stops and recommended a draft condition so that, as a condition precedent to the effective date of the vacation, the applicant must install an improved bus shelter with an accessible boarding pad at its sole expense to preserve ADA access for transit users. As Alyssa Thomas stated, the improved shelter and accessible boarding pad should be provided “as a condition precedent to the effective date on the street vacation.”
- Access during transition and neighbor coordination: Fire had no objection to the vacation but asked that access be maintained while adjacent apartments remain occupied; the applicant reported productive discussions with an adjacent property owner and expects to provide an agreement showing coordination.
Next steps
Planning recommended that the petitioner submit an administrative site plan concurrently with the street‑vacation review. Engineering and utilities asked the applicant to verify pipe sizes and provide record drawings; staff said effective date language and utility easements or operational reroute will be needed to protect public infrastructure if the City agrees to vacate the alley.
Provenance: Topic introduction begins with the applicant’s description of the alley and ends with traffic and engineering conditions for a shelter and storm‑drain work.
