Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homelessness topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Strafford County discusses permanent regional shelter at County Complex; operating-cost split still unresolved
Summary
County officials discussed plans to relocate a temporary warming shelter from Wheelan Pond to a permanent facility on the County Complex, with construction costs proposed to be shared by three cities and the county owning the building. Officials said operating-cost formulas and long-term funding remain to be negotiated.
Strafford County officials outlined plans to site a permanent regional homeless shelter on county-owned land at the County Complex and said Dover, Somersworth and Rochester have indicated willingness to participate in construction costs.
County staff said the county would own the new building and proposed a lease arrangement in which the facility would revert to the county if it ceased operating as a warming shelter. Officials said the three cities would be asked to agree on a contribution formula for construction; operating-cost responsibilities were not finalized.
Staff described multiple options for dividing costs, including apportionment by total assessed valuation across the three cities, a per-capita approach, or usage-based contributions. Officials said those allocation options would be the subject of future negotiations with city councils and could require legislative or budget approvals if the county places operating costs on the county budget.
County staff cited prior seasonal operations as a basis for cost estimates: operating the temporary warming shelter last year cost a little over $200,000 for roughly 120 days. Staff warned that converting a seasonal operation to year-round sheltering would multiply annual operating costs significantly and would require separate discussions about long-term funding sources and grant eligibility.
Officials also said some operating support for the existing service has come through state grants and regional approaches that allow the county to administer funds on behalf of multiple municipalities. Staff emphasized that details on grant routing, whether operational funds stay separate from construction funds, and how ongoing costs would be allocated remain to be settled in future meetings.
The discussion did not produce a final agreement on cost sharing or operations; commissioners instructed staff to continue negotiations with the three cities and to return with specific proposals for construction financing and operational formulas.
