Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Medical Examiner Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Marion County pauses medical examiner office project, seeks partial reimbursement and retains purchased land
Summary
Marion County has paused work on a planned District 5 medical examiner office after neighboring counties sought to leave the district, the county administrator told commissioners Feb. 4, and asked that the county be reimbursed for some preconstruction costs while retaining the land the county bought for the project.
County Administrator Mounier told the board Feb. 4 that Marion County has placed its planned District 5 medical examiner office project on hold after Lake and Seminole counties sought to separate from District 5 and present their request to the Medical Examiner Commission. Mounier said no further work is underway but that Marion County, as the district lead agency, has already incurred costs the county could seek to recover.
Mounier itemized three cost categories: “soft” preconstruction costs (engineer/architect/planning), land acquisition and potential termination exposure to the construction manager. In his presentation he listed the soft costs as $210,000, the Summerfield land purchase as about $2,960,000 and described a potential termination exposure capped at $69,000 for the construction manager’s hours if the project ends. At a later point in the meeting Mounier recommended the county ask the advisory committee to reimburse the county for a portion of the soft costs and stated an amount of $110,000; the transcript records both figures. Commissioners asked staff to press for reimbursement at the advisory meeting on Feb. 12 and approved Mounier’s recommended option 1 by motion.
Commissioner Stone made the motion to approve option 1 (seek reimbursement of at least the soft costs and retain the purchased site while the district status remains uncertain); Commissioner Curry seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
County staff and commissioners said they will press the matter at the Medical Examiner Advisory Board and expect to return to the board with further updates. In the meantime, the county will retain control of the Summerfield parcel so the county can preserve the asset while the district‑level decision is pending.
The board’s action did not authorize additional project spending or cancel existing contracts but it did instruct staff to request reimbursement and to notify the advisory board that Marion County will expect recovery of the costs listed, including potential termination exposure.
