Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Overgrowth topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
York County delays vote on overgrowth ordinance after residents raise enforcement and timing concerns
Summary
The board continued a public hearing on proposed changes to County Code section 19‑6 (overgrowth) to June 17, 2025, after staff presented five situations where the county could require vegetation abatement and residents and supervisors urged more work on scope, dead‑tree treatment and the seven‑day compliance window.
York County staff presented proposed amendments to County Code section 19‑6 on Feb. 18 that would empower the county to require property owners to remove or trim "overgrowth" — defined to include noxious weeds, vines and ivy — when that vegetation obstructs addresses used by emergency services, blocks public rights‑of‑way, obscures sightlines at intersections, impairs emergency escape openings defined by the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, or damages primary or accessory buildings.
Staff said the change follows a 2024 amendment to state code allowing Hampton Roads localities to adopt such provisions and described the county’s likely enforcement framework: written notice to owners, a seven‑day cure period, county abatement if owners fail to act, billing of the owner and a potential tax lien for unpaid costs. Staff noted existing code‑enforcement mowing work averages roughly 16 county‑contract mowing jobs per year at an average cost per property of about $575.
Multiple residents who spoke during the public hearing described long‑standing abandoned properties in their neighborhoods with vines, rain‑damaged roofs and wildlife; speakers asked the board to address dead trees that could fall on houses and to extend the seven‑day compliance window so owner‑occupants and landlords have time to secure contractors. Several supervisors expressed similar concerns about enforcement capacity, fairness to low‑income owners and overlap with homeowner‑association rules.
After public comment and board discussion, the board voted to continue the public hearing and further consider the ordinance at its June 17, 2025 meeting so staff and the board can refine scope, timelines and enforcement mechanics. The motion to continue passed on roll call (5–0). No final ordinance was adopted on Feb. 18.
Ending: Staff will return with revised language addressing dead‑tree hazards, compliance timelines and enforcement staffing/cost implications before the board considers adoption.
