Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Renewable Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve NG/ENGIE solar economic agreement, set bonds and open compliance-officer RFPs amid public concern over permits and drainage
Summary
The board approved revised road-use and drainage bonds for the ENGIE/NG Solar project ($5 million road, $3 million drainage), took four compliance-officer RFPs under advisement, and approved the project's economic development agreement while residents pressed the county on building-permit compliance and neighborhood drainage issues.
The Howard County Board of Commissioners voted to approve several items tied to the ENGIE/NG Solar project: finalized bond amounts for previously approved road-use and drainage agreements, the opening and review of responses to a compliance-officer RFP, and an economic development agreement required under the county's solar ordinance.
County staff told the board that the drainage bond amount was $3,000,000 and the road bond amount was $5,000,000; the board approved both agreements and then approved the drainage agreement. Pam, who announced the RFP openings, said four proposals were received: Butler Fairman, BS Engineering, Aegis and Northpointe Engineering & Surveying. The board voted to take those proposals under advisement and have staff and the county engineer review them and return recommendations by the first commissioners' meeting in August.
During the economic development agreement discussion, Brad Simone and multiple members of the public urged the board to pause or table the EDA until NG/ENGIE complied with the county's zoning ordinance. Simone pointed the board to Howard County zoning ordinance "2009-BCCO-21" (article 7(m) as cited in public comment) and argued that the developer had not applied for a building permit within the ordinance timelines and that failure should void the special exception. Simone warned that residents would pursue legal action if the county proceeded without permit compliance.
County staff and commissioners responded that the EDA is a separate requirement of the solar ordinance and that, in practice, the county has granted extensions for large, complex developments. Greg Lake said projects that require extended time have historically received extensions (for example, some major subdivisions), and that the EDA requirement under the solar ordinance was distinct from building-permit timelines.
After discussion, a commissioner moved and seconded to accept the economic-development agreement from NG Solar; the board approved the EDA by voice vote.
In public comment following the EDA vote, several Cotswold Hills residents described substantial drainage and flooding problems that they attributed to a 24-inch pipe installed under Dixon Road in 2024: recurring basement flooding, eroded embankments, collapsed outlet pipes and sinkholes. Residents asked the county to place the problem on the drainage-board agenda and pressed for faster remediation; county staff said the drainage board meets two weeks after the commissioners' meeting and residents were invited to attend.
