Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges council to rescind Ordinance 3288, comparing short-term rental restrictions to a dog ban
Summary
A resident told the council Ordinance 3288's neighborhood-based restrictions on short-term rentals are arbitrary and urged the city to rescind the ordinance; the speaker compared the rules to an imagined ban on dog ownership in selected neighborhoods to illustrate perceived unfairness.
During the citizens open forum at the July 8 meeting, a resident urged the council to rescind Ordinance 3288, which she said imposes neighborhood-based restrictions on short-term rentals (STRs). The speaker contrasted the ordinance with a hypothetical law that would ban dog ownership in parts of the city, arguing that the rationale used for Ordinance 3288 — noise, trash and unpredictable visitors — could equally be used to justify a geographically selective ban on pet ownership and therefore is arbitrary.
The resident said most STR operators and guests comply with rules and that existing nuisance and noise ordinances provide enforcement tools for problem properties. She framed her remarks as a call for equal application of law and protection of constitutional property rights, asking the council to "rescind 3288." The council did not take action on the request at the meeting; the comment was part of the public-comment portion of the agenda.
