Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Driving License Suspended topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Whatcom County committee questions jail use for driving with suspended license, failure-to-transfer-title arrests
Summary
Whatcom County legal and justice committee met July 8 to examine prosecutions for driving with a suspended license in the third degree and related failure-to-transfer-title arrests, with members raising concerns that those charges are contributing to jail bookings when they are attached to other offenses.
Get email alerts on the Driving License Suspended topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Whatcom Countyon July 8 discussed whether driving with a suspended license in the third degree should be prosecuted as a criminal offense and how related charges, such as failure to transfer title, are contributing to jail bookings.
The conversation focused on two linked concerns: members said stand-alone DWS third-degree charges are frequently dismissed at arraignment but become consequential when paired with other charges, and that failure-to-transfer-title citations tied to routine traffic stops can lead to arrests and custody. "We're just digging deeper financial holes for folks with the prosecution of the DWS thirds," Maya said after surveying district court attorneys, summarizing responses that stand-alone DWS thirds are often dismissed but commonly held when additional charges attach.
Committee members described an informal relicensing practice at the county minimum-security work center. Wendy Jones said deputies previously worked directly with people scheduled for jail time to obtain driving records and help them take steps to restore driving privileges, which reduced repeat bookings: deputies "would sit down with the guy ... and start creating a plan about how they can take care of all of these suspendeds that are floating around." Members suggested reviving a structured program but flagged staffing and funding constraints.
Several members also noted operational questions about how charges reach the courts. Raylene and others asked whether State Patrol electronic filings result in direct files that bypass local screening; Jake said State Patrol files electronically via sector and that he would look into the filing pathway. Caleb said he can generate a report on how many people are booked on DWS third-degree charges and related warrants so the committee can move beyond anecdote to data.
Committee members cited local diversion models they felt might help, including the City of Bellinghamcommunity court and past work by the Northwest Justice Project on driver relicensing; Raylene suggested inviting a Bellingham representative to present on their community court approaches. Raylene and others emphasized that legislative changes would be required to reclassify offenses (for example, shifting focus from DWS third-degree to driving without insurance), and that victim-protection arguments for enforcement were raised by a prosecutor who could not attend.
The committee did not adopt a formal policy change at the meeting but recorded the following next steps and directions: Caleb will produce a report on bookings and warrants related to DWS thirds; committee staff will explore inviting City of Bellingham staff to present on their community court relicensing work; and members will continue to evaluate options for restoring a work-center relicensing program if funding and staffing permit. The discussion repeatedly identified staffing, IT capacity and cross-agency coordination as prerequisites for any data-driven diversion strategy.
The committee adjourned at 12:39 p.m.

