Commissioner Truett introduced an amended resolution asking the commission to exclude glyphosate from county right-of-way spraying programs. The proposed amendment would remove glyphosate (identified in discussion as a broad-spectrum product often used in county vegetation control) from the list of chemicals county crews could use.

Discussion focused on alternatives, cost, and program design. Finance and maintenance staff said replacement products and mixes could be roughly double to triple the cost; one figure mentioned in discussion put a replacement-mix estimate in the mid-thousands for a treatment program, with another speaker saying costs could be in the range of $8,000 to $15,000 for certain mixes or treatment runs. Commissioners and staff discussed a phased approach: removing glyphosate from consideration for the upcoming season, trialing alternatives (branded brush/woody-plant products and targeted spot treatments), and compiling a more detailed, comprehensive plan before making a permanent policy change.

Proponents said removing glyphosate from the county's list of chemicals would not prevent the commission from operating a spray program but would eliminate that specific broad-spectrum product from use. Opponents and operations staff warned the alternatives may require more time and labor and that costs would increase; staff suggested a pilot period and data collection through the season, with a November review to assess cost and effectiveness.

No formal roll-call vote on the glyphosate amendment was recorded in the public transcript; discussion closed with direction to refine the program design and, if desired, present specific language for a formal vote at a future meeting.

Ending: Commissioners asked staff to bring back cost estimates, a proposed pilot plan, and recommended language if a ban is to be considered formally at a later meeting.