Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Organizers urge city to seek transparency and discontinuance of DA inquiry into referendum signers

November 05, 2025 | Salinas, Monterey County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Organizers urge city to seek transparency and discontinuance of DA inquiry into referendum signers
Speakers representing Protect Salinas Renters told the Salinas City Council they are concerned that an investigation into referendum petition signers threatens constitutional protections for petitioning the government and could chill civic participation.

John, speaking for Protect Salinas Renters, said the involvement of law enforcement and the district attorney in a matter tied to referendum petition signers "raises red flags for civil liberties" and warned that "government retaliation such as an investigation or intimidation of petition signers can violate these fundamental rights unless clear criminal conduct is demonstrated." The group urged the city to support transparency under the California Public Records Act and to encourage the discontinuance of what the speakers described as an abusive referral to the district attorney.

Chris Pereira, also speaking with the same group, criticized the use of armed investigators to question signers and urged council members and county supervisors to publicly recognize the exercise of constitutionally protected petition rights; he asked the council to work toward discontinuance of the investigation and to direct staff to disclose records about the referral process.

Other speakers from tenant-advocacy groups said the housing summit and other city outreach should include grassroots renters' organizers who helped gather signatures for the referendum. Several speakers requested copies of records related to the referral to the district attorney and said they would pursue CPRA requests if necessary.

City staff did not announce any new action in response to the comments at the meeting; speakers asked elected officials to use their influence to promote disclosure and to seek an end to a referral they regard as retaliatory.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal