Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves contract amendments for city manager and city attorney after public comment; votes include abstentions and dissent
Summary
The council approved amendments extending terms and adjusting pay for both the city manager and city attorney after public opposition and mixed council votes.
Two executive employment amendments drew extended public comment and council debate on Aug. 19.
City Manager amendment: The city attorney summarized a proposed third amendment extending the city manager's contract to Dec. 31, 2028, providing a 4% cost‑of‑living increase retroactive to July 1, 2025, and increasing severance from six to seven months. The city manager was not present during the reading (02:04:25).
Public speakers opposed the raise given the city's reported budget stress. "How can we afford to give city employees pay raises? The city is in the red," Mike Mohill said (02:04:25). Council discussion acknowledged public concern but also cited the scope of the city manager's responsibilities; the council voted to approve the amendment with one abstention (council member Alcidorian/"Ross Adria" read as abstain on roll call) (02:04:25).
City Attorney amendment: Human Resources presented a second amendment to City Attorney Michael J. Garcia's employment agreement to adjust salary to $332,000 effective with the pay period that includes Aug. 19, 2025, extend the term to Oct. 16, 2027, and revise severance provisions. HR reported earlier market surveys showing the city attorney ranked 7th out of 10 comparable cities and more than 10% below average (02:18:35).
Speakers again opposed the compensation increases; one council member said they would vote no, citing unresolved performance concerns. The council approved the city attorney amendment; roll call reflected at least one No vote (02:18:35).
Why it matters: Compensation and term amendments for senior executives determine leadership continuity and can affect labor relations, budget projections and public perceptions of fiscal priorities.
What's next: The amendments take effect per the terms presented; councilmembers asked for continued performance discussions and follow‑up on accountability measures for the executive offices.
