Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council Adopts Temporary Curfew Ordinance After Two Amendments; 17-Year-Old Exclusion Wins Narrower Vote
Summary
The council debated Proposal 232, amending chapter 3.81 (juvenile curfew). An amendment adding a public-safety preamble was approved unanimously, a second amendment removing 17-year-olds from the temporary public-safety window passed 17-6, and the final ordinance as amended was approved 23-0.
The Indianapolis City-County Council on Aug. 11 approved an amended juvenile curfew ordinance (Proposal 232) after lawmakers adopted two substantive amendments: a recital creating a public-safety trigger and a separate amendment narrowing temporary public-safety curfew hours to exclude 17-year-olds.
What passed: The council first approved an amendment offered by Councilor Michael Delaney that adds a preamble (recitals) stating a public-safety emergency and a 120-day authority to advance curfew hours when conditions justify it. Delaney said the amendment is "what I'm calling a legal preamble that sets into play the public safety hours." That amendment carried unanimously, 23 to 0.
Age-specific amendment and debate: Councilor Todd Evans offered an amendment removing 17-year-olds from the proposed temporary public-safety hours; proponents argued 17-year-olds are near-adult and subjecting them to the more restrictive temporary window was inappropriate, especially during summer daylight hours. The Evans amendment passed 17 to 6.
Enforcement and discretion: During debate, the IMPD chief (present) told the council enforcement would be behaviorally based and that state law already identifies exceptions for school, work and religious activities. The chief said: "It's really behavioral based right," and emphasized officers would not conduct a sweep simply based on age alone.
Final vote and outcome: After amendments were adopted, the council approved Proposal 232 as amended by a final vote of 23 to 0.
Why it matters: The ordinance—amending local code chapter 3.81 and invoking Indiana Code 31-37-3 in the legislative preamble—creates an explicit local mechanism to temporarily advance curfew hours for minors when the city finds current hours are insufficient for public safety. The final version keeps the general curfew framework in place while adding a limited, time-bound tool for responding to acute public-safety incidents.
Selected direct quotes
"All I'm proposing is what I'm call call like a legal preamble that sets into play the public safety hours," Councilor Delaney said when introducing his amendment.
"It's really behavioral based right," the IMPD chief said when describing enforcement discretion.
Actions and votes recorded (from the meeting transcript)
- Motion to amend Proposal 232 with Delaney preamble: Passed 23 to 0. - Motion to amend Proposal 232 to remove 17-year-olds from the temporary public-safety hours (Evans amendment): Passed 17 to 6. - Final motion on Proposal 232 as amended: Passed 23 to 0.
Authorities referenced
The committee and council discussion explicitly cited Indiana Code 31-37-3 and local code chapter 3.81 of the Revised Code of the Consolidated City of Indianapolis and Marion County when framing the ordinance and its emergency trigger.
Context and next steps
The ordinance ordinance grants a 120-day temporary authority to modify curfew hours when a public-safety emergency is determined. Council members and the chief discussed officer discretion and statutory exceptions (school, religious events, work). The council did not further amend enforcement language at this meeting.
