Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Temporary Uses topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council advances permanent rules for temporary uses and structures after removing substantive planning‑commission items
Summary
The council advanced Ordinance 25C‑26 — permanent regulations for temporary uses and structures, including outdoor dining — to second reading after unanimously removing several substantive planning‑commission amendments; staff described a three‑tier permit structure and a temporary‑structure deviation for limited nonconforming uses.
Council members voted unanimously on Nov. 4 to remove a set of substantive planning‑commission recommendations from the proposed permanent regulations for temporary uses and structures (Ordinance 25C‑26) and to schedule the ordinance for second reading on Nov. 18.
Staff (CPD Director Jeff Thomas and planner Molly McGuire) reviewed the history: temporary outdoor‑dining allowances and other interim regulations were adopted during COVID‑era rule changes and renewed in 2024. The proposed permanent code would consolidate rules for commerce on public property (sidewalks and adjacent rights‑of‑way), create clearer thresholds for when permits are required, standardize criteria for approval, and add a new temporary‑structure deviation pathway that would allow certain temporary nonconforming structures to exceed dimensional standards if they provide a significant public benefit and meet screening and compatibility standards.
The Planning Commission’s recommendation separated changes into minor and substantive amendments. Among substantive proposals were a change that would have allowed a 20‑year renewal path for certain temporary‑structure deviations (log 19) and other items affecting permit durations and notification. Mayor Saleem Nies moved — and Council member Andraal seconded — a motion to remove the planning commission’s substantive log items 3, 4, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 27 from the draft ordinance and to put the ordinance on second reading. The motion passed on a roll call vote of Aye: Rosenbaum, Becker, Weicker, Andraal, Weinberg, Mayor Nies (6‑0; Council member Reynolds absent).
Discussion at the meeting included questions about the planning commission’s rationale for removing a 30‑day extension for temporary membrane structures and clarifications that most temporary‑use permits require annual reapplication under the interim regulations. Planning Chair Daniel Thompson said the planning commission sought to allow limited nonconforming temporary structures (for example, covered tennis courts) when they provide significant public benefit and to limit neighborhood impacts; staff noted the planning commission’s proposed renewal schedule for deviations was a substantive recommendation not present in the current interim regulations.
No final adoption occurred; Ordinance 25C‑26 will return for second reading on Nov. 18 with the noted substantive items removed per the Nov. 4 vote.
