Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Contested Case Hearing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

TCEQ grants contested‑case hearings for Lower Valley Water District permit; sets issues and 180‑day limit

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality · January 31, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission granted several individual and group hearing requests related to a proposed new permit for Lower Valley Water District (final phase discharge up to 900,000 gpd), referred three issues to SOAH — water quality protectiveness, odors/siting (30 TAC 309.13) and compliance history — and set a 180‑day maximum hearing duration.

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality on Jan. 30 granted timely hearing requests challenging a new TPDES permit application by the Lower Valley Water District and referred the matter to the State Office of Administrative Hearings on several issues. The application would authorize a final-phase discharge of up to 900,000 gallons per day.

In making the effectiveness determination, the commission applied the two-step test: whether the hearing requesters are affected persons and whether they raised relevant and material issues within TCEQ's jurisdiction. The chair recommended granting the hearing requests of named individuals (Magda Flores; Rosa Maria Gallo Aviccia; Thomas Hausler; Maria Mendoza; Angel Ordelas; Rafael Ramirez; Anna Sanchez) and the Fadens Take Charge group, finding proximity to the discharge and specifics in the hearing requests met the affected-person standard. The commission denied two other requests (Mediterio and Maria Sanchez) as those requesters did not show an individualized impact beyond general concerns about odors and water quality.

The commission referred three issues for contested-case hearing: (1) whether the draft permit is protective of water quality under Chapter 307 (Texas Surface Water Quality Standards) and related regulations; (2) whether the draft permit adequately protects against nuisance odors and complies with siting requirements under 30 TAC §309.13; and (3) whether the applicant’s or operator’s compliance history warrants denial or modification of the draft permit. Commissioners set a maximum contested-case hearing duration of 180 days from preliminary hearing to the issuance of a proposal for decision.

The motion to grant and to refer the identified issues carried on voice vote.