Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Cannabis Moratorium topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Norton enacts six‑month moratorium on permits for adult‑use cannabis businesses

Norton City Council · January 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Norton City Council on Dec. 16 adopted Ordinance 137‑2024, a six‑month moratorium on permitting of adult‑use cannabis businesses.

The Norton City Council on Dec. 16 adopted Ordinance 137‑2024, a six‑month moratorium on applications for and the granting of zoning certificates for any building, structure, use or change of use that would enable the cultivation, processing, distribution or sale of adult‑use cannabis. Council adopted the ordinance by roll‑call vote after a motion to waive the second and third readings and adopt was approved unanimously.

Council members and staff framed the moratorium as a temporary measure to give the city time to review applicable state and local statutes, study regulatory options and allow the planning commission to make recommendations on zoning locations for such facilities. A council member said the moratorium can be lifted at any time if council adopts a permanent plan.

During discussion council members and staff clarified that the moratorium covers permitting of businesses (retail, cultivation, processing and related commercial licenses) and does not change or restrict individual uses that are permitted under state law (for example, personally permitted home cultivation or other statutorily allowed individual activities). A council member cited state revenue figures, noting roughly $132 million statewide in a recent three‑month period and pointing out a 10% state tax that is distributed into multiple state funds; council members also noted municipal taxes and local income tax revenues could apply to employees at local facilities.

Opponents were not recorded in public comment during this meeting; council debate focused on timing, zoning classification and whether the planning commission should study possible locations if council leans toward permitting. One council member expressed concern about product marketing that resembles children’s cereal and said that protecting children weighed into their view of whether and how to permit retail products.

The ordinance declares an emergency and was adopted following a roll‑call vote recorded in the public minutes where all present members voted “Yes.”