Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Graham County Board, Jan. 21, 2025
Summary
The board approved routine minutes and warrants and a set of staff requests including a tax‑deed sale, a right‑of‑way quitclaim, staffing and contract approvals, a special‑event liquor license and the Antiquities Act resolution; most votes were unanimous voice votes.
The Graham County Board of Supervisors took the following recorded actions at its Jan. 21, 2025 meeting (motion/second and vote outcomes as recorded in the minutes):
- Approved minutes from the Jan. 6 meeting (voice vote). - Approved payment of demands and handwritten warrants over $1,000 after review (voice vote). - Approved an over‑the‑counter tax deed from an adjoining property owner for parcel 10612103, the offer representing taxes, fees and accrued interest as presented by County Treasurer Cindy Orr (motion made and seconded; voice vote recorded as aye). - Approved creation of a juvenile activities consequence coordinator position to be funded by the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC); county to advertise for the post (motion made and seconded; voice vote recorded as aye). - Accepted a quitclaim deed from Celia Ornelas granting the north 50 feet of her parcel as right of way for Powerline Road (motion made and seconded; voice vote recorded as aye). - Approved an agreement to add contractor Melissa Alder to the county mental and behavioral health program; county staff said a United Way funding cycle supports the role (motion made and seconded; voice vote recorded as aye). - Approved a special‑event liquor license for the Big Buck Contest at the Graham County Fairgrounds on Feb. 22, 2025; the county license will be suspended for the event period (motion made and seconded; voice vote recorded as aye). - Adopted Resolution 2025‑01 opposing unilateral use of the Antiquities Act (motion made and seconded; recorded unanimous voice vote).
Where the meeting transcript did not specify a mover or seconder by name, the minutes record the motion and a second; all listed items passed on voice votes. Specific vote tallies by supervisor name were not read into the record for each item; the minutes show items passed with "aye" responses.
